((liferafting from Posterous)) I am a cat who sometimes appears as a neko. I am a girl. I like to sail, build, explore, converse, fly, and defy conventional expectations. I am loved by those who love me and I love them for putting up with me - befriending a cat takes skill and patience. I live most of my virtual life in the East River Community of Second Life. I also really, really like tuna.
Friday, December 31, 2010
Cats at home
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Eira, the silly kitty
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Poseidon Island
Sea of Fables
Off to sail...
Aboard 'Skies of Azure'
Saturday, November 13, 2010
The Ladycats of the Royal Court
Me, dancing with my wife Azure (in the teal qipao) and my love Chakku (decked out in uniform) at the after-party for the Sailor of the Year Awards at the Hollywood Bowl. Not present in the picture at this particular time is Princess Sue, who was off on a secret mission for the Queen and The Trees (obtaining tuna).
Friday, October 29, 2010
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
@SYSKPodcast, that's not how it works! (mostly)
First: shame on you, @SYSKPodcast, for distilling polyamory down to being basically "a bunch of people cohabitating, not married, who all have sexual access to each other." (Words paraphrased, but not by very much.)
Not to sound stereotypical, but is it always about sex with you being guys? :3
First, please take a look at the root words implicit in the word 'polyamory.' Poly-, meaning 'many.' -amory, as in, love. Multiple love. And that's it.
What about 'sexual access?' Well, sure, that can be implied. People in love, who are of a desire to have sex with each other, generally tend to at some point. But just being in a polyamorous relationship does not necessarily mandate that orgies can break out at the drop of a hat. I believe you have even said in a few of your podcasts, "correlation does not imply causation" and words to the effect. Poly people might have sex. That doesn't mean that's why they're poly.
Now, I know, by 'sexual access,' you are being clinical and probably intended to be correct and probably (hopefully?) wanted so badly to imply 'access means the ability to have sex, not necessarily the absolute constant act.' But my friends, that's not how the podcast played the concept out. You spoke at length about reproductive issues, family planning, etc. It was rapidly clear that by 'sexual access,' intentionally or no, you were iplying that sex is something that is definitely going on in said relationship and was a defining part of it, just by talking about sex to the length you did.
I am poly, both in my real life (as A) and in my virtual life (as Elisha). Does that mean that I have sex with everyone in my poly group that I come in contact with?
Ha! They only wish. (tongue in cheek -- my own)
In my real life, I am in a fairly committed relationship with one man. This committed relationship, for what its worth, does include (rather good) sex. However, I have at various times, been in relationships with others at the same time. Others who all knew of each other, approved of each other, but -- and this is the important part -- did not necessarily want to do the boinkity boink with each other. Further, at the moment, there are another two people I am madly in love with, who reciprocate, and none of the three of us have any desire to necessarily "have sexual access" with each other. These two are purely romantic, supportive, emotional relationships that have effectively no sexual motive at all whatsoever.
Virtually, I am also in a strong relationship with a small rosette of people. There are moderate romantic and affectionate relationships with a few others. And do we all have cybersex, and cyber orgies? Frankly: some of the people in my 'polyamorous cloud' actually strongly dislike each other. Or are of the incorrect sexual preference to even be desirable. They're not in the relationship to have sexual access to each other. They're in it because they're in love with me, and I love them as well.
(An aside: yes, online relationships are just as able to contain love and passion and tenderness and emotion as physical ones. Even if the online selves never meet in meatspace. Love is love is love no matter how, or where, it is expressed. Desire too. Affection as well.)
So, if you were to ask me if either of my poly clouds (virtual or real) fit your definition, I would have to smile and say, "no."
What my clouds are, are are groups of people who may, or may not, love other portions of the rest of the group in varying degrees, who may or may not have sex with each other in whatever manner appropriate to the medium, but who in some way do feature me either as a beloved girlfriend, partner, mate, playmate, caregiver, confidante, friend, and what have you. That's what polyamory is.
To me, anyway.
I love your podcast, I don't want to think that you two are flawed in your research and thinking. You have a lot of stuff to distill down into a short format to hit the essentials (and really, it was about polygamy and bigamy law, and not polyamory specifically) but... maybe a better concise summary of polyamory that you could have used without making it seem like a casa de orgy could have been "polyamory is a group of people in a multiply-committed relationship sans marriage." It's much more correct, much more accurate, and doesn't read like a potential slight on the poly community
I would like to think of this as more of a correction, and clarification, and chance for further research and introspection on the topic, than a criticism. Therefore, I suggest http://www.polyamorysociety.org/page6.html for some information about what polyamory is, and isn't. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-polyamory.htm is also very good too, as is http://www.lovemore.com/faq.php, which is generally my go-to page when I need to explain what poly is, and isn't.
And I leave you with this though: if it were all about the sex, being poly wouldn't be hard work. And it is very, very hard work. Enough people have hard enough time maintaining one stable relationship, but who would agree it is worth doing so if they can pull it off.
Try maintaining three, or more.
But when it works, it is so definitely worth it.
And that said: I love you, Scott. And Mark. And Rachael. And Vanora. And Azure. And Sue. And Chakku. And Amanda. And Starry. And Sarny. And Drav...
Monday, October 4, 2010
Hang onto your cat, it's a time machine!
So, looong ago, a younger me had an in-character (for the most part) LiveJournal. I'm pretty much done with LJ as a platform - it was too much to maintain that as a personal blog, and my blogger as a semi-professional-inchar blog; and I haven't really done anything with it in years.
But Posterous will let me import, oh yes. So, import I shall.
Which means there is going to be a deluge of old, somewhat more juvenile (it's the Elisha from her late teens and early twenties, after all (note: I said, in-character)) postings in here. Fair warning. I had set the 'adult' flag in LJ for my diary, and there is probably a bit of embarrassing stuff in there as well as stuff that is no longer relevant to the modern me. But it's still part of the Elisha mythos, and should be preserved somewhere (as, eventually, I'm going to tear down the livejournal and the blogger accounts).
Shermeow, set the wayback machine!
Sunday, October 3, 2010
A little slow on the get-go...
So, Indigo turned me on to the idea of Posterous some time ago, in conjunction with the East River Community blog - so I created one for myself too.
Of course, half a year later and I have barely used it. Perhaps I should change that. Sometimes things happen that I just cannot keep my mouth shut about anymore.
Hello, world!
Wednesday, June 2, 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
5/26/10, Holly's
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
5/24/10, Port Kirkstone
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Welcome to The Elishacat Diaries
elishacat- April 21st, 12:16
- Current Mood:
creative
Monday, January 18, 2010
Friday, January 15, 2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
1/12/10, Ohno
smaller from the trolley...
1/11/10, Holly Golightly's
Monday from 2pm to 4pm SLT).